SPARK Capacity Assessment

Find out how AI-ready your reasoning is across six capacity dimensions.

Six short scenarios. One per dimension. No multiple choice. Every response is scored by an AI scoring engine against a published rubric, and you receive a structured report card showing what your reasoning did well and where to grow.

6Dimensions

~30 minTime needed

1-5Per dimension

What gets scored

Reasoning Under Ambiguity
Learning Velocity
Communication Architecture
Creative Problem Decomposition
Judgment Calibration
Stakeholder Navigation

About you

Your name appears on your report. We use your email to send you a copy and to follow up if your team or employer requests it. Phone and organization are optional and help us reach you for any questions about your results.

Full name *

Email *

Phone (optional)

Organization (optional)

Your information is used to deliver your report and to follow up about your results. We do not sell or share it with third parties. You can request deletion at any time by emailing the contact on your report.

Access code

Enter the access code that was emailed to you after purchase. Each code grants one full six-dimension assessment.

Need a code? Purchase an assessment.

How this works. Each response is scored by an AI scoring engine trained on a published rubric. Scoring takes roughly ten seconds per task. Every score is recorded with the exact rubric version and model version that produced it. Scores are subject to human review under the SPARK quality program.

Developmental feedback only. This assessment is intended for self-knowledge and team development. It is not a hiring credential and the scores should not be used for hiring, firing, promotion, or compensation decisions. The five non-reasoning rubrics are interim v0.1.0 versions and are improving as we collect calibration data.

Task 1 of 6

01Task

—

What a strong response looks like

Show your reasoning, not just your conclusion. A strong response works through the situation in roughly this order:

Name what is uncertain. What is missing, conflicting, or open to more than one reading in the situation? What would you need to know to be more confident?
Generate at least two interpretations. The situation is consistent with more than one reading of what is going on. Spell out the readings and how their implications differ.
Weigh the interpretations and commit. Which reading does the available evidence favor, and why? State the action you would take and the assumptions it rests on.
State a decision rule. What new information would change your action? Under what conditions would you revisit the choice, and on what timeline?
Step back from the immediate decision. What does this situation reveal about the broader information environment? Is the uncertainty here something specific evidence will resolve, or is it structural, something the situation itself tells you about how the system is working?

Your response

0 WORDS

Scoring your response


✓Your report card Overall capacity band — Average score: — — Capacity distribution Each axis is a capacity dimension on the 1-5 rubric. The amber polygon shows where your reasoning sits across the six dimensions in this assessment. What this report is and is not. This is developmental feedback to help you understand your reasoning across six AI-relevant capacity dimensions. It is not a hiring credential. The five non-reasoning rubrics are interim v0.1.0 versions and the scoring is improving as we collect calibration data. Scores should not be used for hiring, firing, promotion, or compensation decisions. Want to discuss your results? Book a short call with our team to walk through your report, talk through development next steps, or explore whether SPARK fits your team. Book a call

✓Your report card

Overall capacity band

—

Average score: —

—

Capacity distribution

Each axis is a capacity dimension on the 1-5 rubric. The amber polygon shows where your reasoning sits across the six dimensions in this assessment.

What this report is and is not. This is developmental feedback to help you understand your reasoning across six AI-relevant capacity dimensions. It is not a hiring credential. The five non-reasoning rubrics are interim v0.1.0 versions and the scoring is improving as we collect calibration data. Scores should not be used for hiring, firing, promotion, or compensation decisions.

!Error